黃錦源大律師

認許年份: 2023

黃錦源大律師於 2023 年獲得香港大律師執業資格,並在師從陳永豪大律師(現陳永豪資深大律師)、伍頴珊大律師、潘定邦大律師及林樂夫大律師後加入本大律師事務所。

黃大律師正發展與本大律師事務所各專業領域範圍有關的業務,尤其專注於建築、土地及建築物管理、 傷亡訴訟、部門傳票和仲裁。他恆常受委聘在各級法院應訊。他接受本大律師事務所各專業領域範圍的指示。


學歷

法學學士 (諾丁漢大學)

法學專業證書 (香港城市大學) 


近期案件

Construction and Arbitration

Hang Chin Marble Engineering Ltd. v Pacific Marble & Granite Ltd. [2025] HKCFI 480 – represented the plaintiff at trial and successfully claimed against the contractor for outstanding payments. (with Solomon Lam)

Wing Lok Construction & Engineering Co. Ltd. v Techoy Construction Co. Ltd.

  • [2025] HKCFI 5546 – represented the defendant at trial and successfully defended and counterclaimed against the subcontractor over a dispute in a demolition and ancillary works sub-contract. (with Solomon Lam)
  • [2025] HKCFI 3310 – represented the defendant and succeeded in resisting the plaintiff’s application to amend the statement of claim. (with Solomon Lam)

CCC v AAC

  • [2025] HKCFI 2987 – successfully resisted an application to set aside the enforcement order of an arbitral award. (with Oscar Tan and Jason PH Wong)
  • [2025] HKCFI 5023 – leave to appeal. (with Oscar Tan and Jason PH Wong)

E Villas Ltd v Lai Yuk Shan [2026] HKDC 225 – represented the Defendant at trial and successfully defended against a company for alleged outstanding payments on a development project under the Small House Policy of the District Lands Office. (with Oscar Tan)

Wong Kin Tit t/a Flourish Engineering Company v Zeng Yongju and Lam Yuen Piu t/a Lung Shan Construction Company (A Firm) [2025] HKDC 2109 – represented the Defendant against the contractor in a trial over the issue of outstanding payment and repudiation of a construction contract. (with Kwan Ping Kan)

HCCT 91/2022 – represented the plaintiff at trial against the air-conditioning supplier for repudiation of a supply contract. (with Solomon Lam)

HCCT 26/2024 – representing the plaintiff against the subcontractor for outstanding loans and overpayment.

DCCJ 1271/2020 – represented the plaintiff at trial against the contractor for outstanding payments. (with Solomon Lam)

A construction arbitration – represented the Respondent at trial over a dispute in a joint venture agreement in a construction project. (with Matthew Cheung)

A construction arbitration – representing the sub-sub-contractor against a sub-contractor for outstanding payments in a sub-contract for HVAC building service works. (With Solomon Lam and Matthew Cheung)

A construction arbitration – representing the main contractor against a sub-contractor over a breach of contractual duties in a construction project. (With Matthew Cheung)

Land, Building Management

IO of Pak Tat Mansion v Tang Kee Tong t/a Chili King [2026] HKLdT 26 – Represented the respondent (Squatter) at trial in a dispute over the title to a part of the common parts of the building.

黃桂金及另一人 對 銅鑼灣灣景樓C座業主立案法團 [2026] HKLdT 34 – Represented the respondent (Incorporated Owners) at trial over building management matters.

HCA 1254/2024 – represented the plaintiff and successfully claimed title of land by adverse possession

Personal Injuries / Employees’ Compensation

Lau Oi Wing v Tsang Wing Kong t/a Kim Yuen Recycle Co (sued as a firm) and Others [2025] 3 HKLRD 804 – successful joinder application out of time in an employees’ compensation claim.

Wu Wai Lam Bebi v Bat Chan [2025] HKDC 1419 – successful personal injury claim against a stretching instructor providing fitness sessions for the plaintiff.

Departmental Summons

香港特別行政區 訴 衞安工程有限公司 及另一人 HCMA 143/2025 – representing the sub-contractors at trial and on appeal who were summoned with one count of “liability of proprietor”. Pending judgment. (with Oscar Tan)

香港特別行政區 訴 比特工程管理有限公司 (HCMA 138/2026) – representing the sub-contractor at trial and on appeal who were summoned with one count of “Failing to pay wages on due date”. Pending judgment.

STS 6263,6264/2025 – representing the main contractor at trial who was summoned with 1 count of “fail to take such precautions as were necessary to prevent a workman working at the construction site from being struck by falling object”.

ESS 20730-20734/2024 – represented the company who was summoned with 5 counts of “Carried out building works without having first obtained from the Building Authority his approval in writing of documents submitted to him in accordance with the regulations”.

STS 3356, 3357/2023 – represented the sub-contractor at trial who was summoned with 2 counts of “fail to take adequate steps to prevent a person on the site from falling from a height of 2 metres or more”.